Nätpyton vs dvärgnät, storlekar

Westman skrev:
Broghammerus  va inte det R Hoser som ändra till det?

johansk skrev:
Tack all information är kul :) är själv permiterad just nu så har tid :) såg en bra länk från zoonen som förklarar bra med alla lokaliteter och storlekar :)

Kakmonstret skrev:


Ja det var Hoser, 2004, men tydligen på fel sätt.

Här är direkt ur Reynolds et al., 2014:

"Recently, Rawlings et al. (2008) used the genus Broghammerus for the monophyletic clade containing the Southeast Asian B. reticulatus and the Lesser Sundan endemic B. timoriensis to resolve the apparent paraphyly of the genus Python. Like Rawlings et al. (2008) and Pyron et al. (2013b), we found support for the distinction of this clade (BS = 96, PP = 1.0). However, though used by Rawlings et al. (2008) in a peer-reviewed publication, the genus name Broghammerus Hoser 2004 is technically invalid, as it resulted initially from a non-peer reviewed writing that included no formal data or analyses (Kaiser et al., 2013). Though Rawlings et al. (2008) redescribed the genus in a peer-reviewed publication based on apparently sound molecular and morphological data, these authors did not formalize their description as required by Article 16.1 of the ICZN. Furthermore, consensus from the herpetological community suggests that invalid names should be abandoned (Kaiser et al., 2013). Hence, a new name is needed for this clade (Pyron et al., 2013b), and no suitable
synonym is available. Following articles 10.3, 10.4, 11.8, and 42 of the ICZN, we ascribe the genus name Malayopython (Appendix A) to the clade containing the species M. reticulatus and M. timoriensis, after the location of the neotype of M. reticulatus reticulatus in Rengit, West Malaysia (Auliya et al., 2002) [holotype is lost, Kluge, 1993]."

Westman skrev:
Allt Hoser andrar kan man skita i  :)

Kakmonstret skrev:


Ja det var Hoser, 2004, men tydligen på fel sätt.

Här är direkt ur Reynolds et al., 2014:

"Recently, Rawlings et al. (2008) used the genus Broghammerus for the monophyletic clade containing the Southeast Asian B. reticulatus and the Lesser Sundan endemic B. timoriensis to resolve the apparent paraphyly of the genus Python. Like Rawlings et al. (2008) and Pyron et al. (2013b), we found support for the distinction of this clade (BS = 96, PP = 1.0). However, though used by Rawlings et al. (2008) in a peer-reviewed publication, the genus name Broghammerus Hoser 2004 is technically invalid, as it resulted initially from a non-peer reviewed writing that included no formal data or analyses (Kaiser et al., 2013). Though Rawlings et al. (2008) redescribed the genus in a peer-reviewed publication based on apparently sound molecular and morphological data, these authors did not formalize their description as required by Article 16.1 of the ICZN. Furthermore, consensus from the herpetological community suggests that invalid names should be abandoned (Kaiser et al., 2013). Hence, a new name is needed for this clade (Pyron et al., 2013b), and no suitable
synonym is available. Following articles 10.3, 10.4, 11.8, and 42 of the ICZN, we ascribe the genus name Malayopython (Appendix A) to the clade containing the species M. reticulatus and M. timoriensis, after the location of the neotype of M. reticulatus reticulatus in Rengit, West Malaysia (Auliya et al., 2002) [holotype is lost, Kluge, 1993]."

Kakmonstret skrev:
Nu ska vi inte gå ifrån trådens ämne och dessutom smutskasta någon, även om personen förtjänar det eller ej. :)

Jag har hittat massa underhållande information om denna människa och har fått min bild efter lite skratt och gråt.


Nu väntar jag på nätpytonlokalitetslänken som tidigare hittats på zoonen. :)